358
admit of our prolonging the period of detention in barracks, it would be better that he should detain only those persons who were actually affected, and set at liberty the others, but, at the same time informing me of the places to which they were going. The existing laws could not possibly have been more closely adhered to, without overstepping their provisions, and setting at liberty immediately all those whose cases did not require watching (No.12).
The Board, with the earnest desire of rejecting no immigrants excepting those actually suffering from trachoma, issued orders, as has been previously observed, that a fresh visit should be made, and having done so, the Delegate satisfied himself of the existence of trachoma in each and every one of the 371 cases on board, and he also observed the same disease to be developing itself amongst the 20 immigrants who had been placed under observation as suspicious cases in the barracks, as may be seen from the copy of telegram No.10.
Telegram No.13 states that the period of observation to which the immigrants had been subjected, having expired, 111 of them were allowed to depart, and 28 were returned to the "Suisang" suffering from trachoma. The Delegate further observes that 8 remained in the barracks, 111 with the mumps, and that of the 11 second-class passengers who had been lodged in the barracks for the purpose of keeping them under observation, 10 had been set at liberty in spite of their being all seriously affected with trachoma, as they had informed the Authorities of the destination for which they were bound, and only one remained in the barracks who was ill with the mumps. Consequently, on the 29th of May 399 immigrants had been definitely rejected on the grounds of being afflicted with trachoma. Fourteen trachomatous persons who had been left behind by the steamer "Marie" were also transferred to the "Suisang", and who, in conformity with existing regulations were required to be re-embarked on the first of the Company's steamers sailing for Hong Kong. I should observe that the practice has always been acquiesced in by the China Commercial Steamship Company.
In telegram No.14 dated the 1st of June, the Delegate
358
admit of our prolonging the period of detention in
barracks, it would be better that he should detain only
those persons who were actually affected, and set at
liberty the others, but, at the same time informing me
of the places to which they were going. The existing
laws could not possibly have been more closely adhered
to, without overstepping their provisions, and setting
at liberty immediately all those whose cases did not
require watching (No.12).
The Board, with the earnest desire of rejecting
no immigrants excepting those actually suffering from
trachoma, issued orders, as has been previously observed,
that a fresh visit should be made, and having done so,
the Delegate satisfied himself of the existence of
trachoma in each and every one of the 371 cases on
board, and he also observed the same disease to be
developing itself amongst the 20 immigrants who had
been placed under observation as suspicious cases in
the barracks, as may be seen from the copy of telegram
No.10.
Telegram No.13 states that the period of observa-
tion
observation to which the immigrants had been subjected,
having expired, 111 of them were allowed to depart,
and 28 were returned to the "Suisang" suffering from
trachoma. The Delegate further observes that 8 remain-
ed in the barracks, 1ll with the mumps, and that of the
11 second class passengers who had been lodged in the
barracks for the purpose of keeping them under observa-
tion, 10 had been set at liberty in spite of their be-
ing all seriously affected with trachoma, as they had
informed the Authorities of the destination for which
they were bound, and only one remained in the barracks
who was ill with the mumps. Consequently, on the 29th
of May 399 immigrants had been definitely rejected on
the grounds of being afflicted with trachoma. Four-
teen trachomatous persons who had been left behind by
the steamer "Marie" were also transferred to the
"Suisang", and who, in conformity with existing regula-
tions were required to be re-embarked on the first of
the Company's steamers sailing for Hong Kong. I should
observe that the practice has always been acquiesced
in by the China Commercial Steamship Company.
In telegram No.14 dated the 1st of June, the
Delegate
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.